Melodeon.net Forums
Discussions => Other Free Reed Instruments => Topic started by: Bill the Farmer on August 01, 2017, 11:41:18 AM
-
A neighbour across the road has acquired what he called a Victorian squeezebox. When he showed it to me it's an English concertina similar to this one ANTIQUE CIRCA 1914 LACHENAL & Co 48 BUTTON ENGLISH CONCERTINA (http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ANTIQUE-CIRCA-1914-LACHENAL-Co-48-BUTTON-ENGLISH-CONCERTINA-/253040341426?hash=item3aea6131b2:g:Lp8AAOSwwvZZPUlv), but possibly newer. However there is no label on either end, the middle two rows of buttons have the notes carved into them (inverse embossing - whatever you call that), there are a couple of red buttons and the accidentals are black. There are a few notes that need a bit of TLC, I didn't try them all. The bellows are in good condition with nice bellows papers and airtight. It comes in a wooden hexagonal box with a hinged lid.
I said off the top of my head it was probably a Lachenal English concertina and there might be a label inside one of the ends, but when I looked online, I couldn't find a concertina with no label apart from modern ones. Have I told him a load of old cobblers?
-
A neighbour across the road has acquired what he called a Victorian squeezebox. When he showed it to me it's an English concertina similar to this one ANTIQUE CIRCA 1914 LACHENAL & Co 48 BUTTON ENGLISH CONCERTINA (http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ANTIQUE-CIRCA-1914-LACHENAL-Co-48-BUTTON-ENGLISH-CONCERTINA-/253040341426?hash=item3aea6131b2:g:Lp8AAOSwwvZZPUlv), but possibly newer. However there is no label on either end, the middle two rows of buttons have the notes carved into them (inverse embossing - whatever you call that), there are a couple of red buttons and the accidentals are black. There are a few notes that need a bit of TLC, I didn't try them all. The bellows are in good condition with nice bellows papers and airtight. It comes in a wooden hexagonal box with a hinged lid.
I said off the top of my head it was probably a Lachenal English concertina and there might be a label inside one of the ends, but when I looked online, I couldn't find a concertina with no label apart from modern ones. Have I told him a load of old cobblers?
From your description it sounds very much like a Lachenal English concertina. Quite often the label is missing after this length of time (it's only paper/thin card). The coloured buttons with the inscribed note names are commonly characteristic of the lower-end range of Lachenal concertinas. These were made in their thousands back in the day. The hexagonal wooden box also is typical of Lachenal.
You might get more information over at concertina.net if you haven't already posted there.
-
Thanks for responding, I thought someone on here would know more than me.
The reason I mentioned the lack of label is that there is no oval cutout in either of the ends for the label to show through. I haven't posted on concertina.net because I don't have an account and don't really want yet another set of login details to forget. I shall have to get the neighbour to show it me again and try taking the ends off. Perhaps the duff notes just need some dust removing.
-
The reason I mentioned the lack of label is that there is no oval cutout in either of the ends for the label to show through.
If you've remembered rightly, that could be a description of an early one, from before Lachenal even started making, whilst most English concertinas had the sort of buttons you're describing.
Put up a photo and I might be able to tell you what it is.
-
Wheatstone "student" models were similar, with all the Cs in red and the outer rows black. I don't recall ever seeing the buttons inscribed with their notes, though, nor one without the oval fretwork for the label. Also came in a hexagonal wooden box with a leather strap handle and usually missing the key for the lock.
Rob.
-
Put up a photo and I might be able to tell you what it is.
I took the ends off, no clue to the manufacturer, but lots of advertising by the shop, J J Vickers, 82 Royal Hill Greenwich, LONDON SE, including a photo of a distinguished looking gent. Serial number 22936 on the ends and the reed pans both ends. It needs new valves, some are missing and some of the pads have holes chewed in them! And I don't understand how you get at the other side of the reed pans.
I've put a set of photos on Flickr - English Concertina (https://www.flickr.com/photos/billthefarmer/albums/72157684421324711) because of the limit here.
Also came in a hexagonal wooden box with a leather strap handle and usually missing the key for the lock.
The leather strap handle is broken off and the key is missing.
-
One tell-tale sign is the alignment of the three screws in the fingerslide. Wheatsone concertinas have all three in line, Lachenal always had the center screw slightly higher than the other two which this one has. All this tells you is that it's not a Wheatstone, it may well be Lachenal but other makers may have offset the centre screw too, I simply don't know.
-
Serial number 22936 on the ends and the reed pans both ends.
That sounds like a Lachenal, or a Wheatstone, number from the second half of the 19th century.
I've put a set of photos on Flickr - English Concertina (https://www.flickr.com/photos/billthefarmer/albums/72157684421324711) because of the limit here.
I'm afraid I have internet problems at the moment and can't see them there. I've given up after an hour of trying. :(
-
If I may make so bold: (the arrow is mine)
-
If I may make so bold: (the arrow is mine)
Thanks for that, you beat me to it, and I missed the oval hole for the label - can't see for looking :-[
-
Looks like a Lachenal to me. The bellows papers are Lachenal design too. Also the serial number in 5 figures, supports the idea of a almost mass-produced instrument, again pointing to Lachenal.
Finally, looking at the zoomed in view of this photo (https://www.flickr.com/photos/billthefarmer/36148249992) the lever arms visible through the fretwork show a 'hook and lever' type action pivot - typical of Lachenal, whereas Wheatstones have a superior riveted action pivot
-
If its from vickers its most likely a latchenal
-
Hi Bill, I have a Lachenal almost identical to your photos, mine still carries the correct Lachenal label, as does the box. The serial number of mine is 59018 which I am told dates it around 1915. My keys are, as yours inscribed with the note letters, the C keys being red. I believe the keys are made from bone.
To get to the other side of the reed pan insert a finger in center of the pan taking care to stay clear of the inside reeds, and, using your thumb to gently push on the outside case edges pull the reed plate out from the casing, it is a tight push fit without glue or fixings of any kind. The individual reeds may then be withdrawn from the edges of the reed plate, they fit in dovetail tapers. As you may be aware the gaskets on all the edges are chamoise leather, take all care not to pull them off or disturb them. Take careful note of the way the reed beds fit and refit them correctly. Using either a steel rule or screwdriver very gently abrade all gasket surfaces before refitting. It goes without saying these old instruments deserve respect and love, if in any doubt leave it alone and refer to one of the respected fettelers on this forum.
-
If I may make so bold: (the arrow is mine)
Thanks Malcolm - yes, THOSE holes each side... ;)
A cheap brass-reeded Lachenal model No. 3 then, from about 1878, that looks like it never got played. Whilst somebody has removed not only the Lachenal label out of the right hand oval, but also the Lachenal name from the reed pan labels too, to deliberately hide the maker.
It would have taken Wheatstone's another 20-odd years to reach that serial number.
If its from vickers its most likely a latchenal
Actually, there are surviving J. J. Vickers price lists (http://www.concertina.com/pricelists/dealers/Vickers-Pricelist-c1935.pdf) that contain nearly as many Wheatstone's as Lachenal's.
-
Here's a link to a restored Lachenal label I created some years ago now. There used to be a permanent link on the Concertina.net website but most of that (with the exception of the Forum) is closed down now.
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk137/p_m_dunk/Labels/lach_label_plus_border.jpg (http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk137/p_m_dunk/Labels/lach_label_plus_border.jpg)
Save
-
Thanks very much for all the informative responses. I've put this page and the Flickr album page up on my neighbour's Mac for him so he can see what people have written. The reason I missed the oval cutout was that I was looking for a oval blank place where the label would have been, not realizing it would have been stuck to the back of the fretwork. I've never handled or taken apart an English concertina before, it was very interesting to compare the build quality, with all the pristine chamois gaskets to, say, a modern Chinese Hohner. And Lachenal were turning them out in their thousands.
-
I've put this page and the Flickr album page up on my neighbour's Mac for him so he can see what people have written.
And if he, or anybody else, would like to read up on Louis Lachenal and his revolutionary development work for Wheatstone's before setting up as a manufacturer in his own right, and the eventual takeover of the Lachenal firm by Wheatstone's 75 years later - there are a couple of papers online that I can thoroughly recommend:
Louis Lachenal: “Engineer and Concertina Manufacturer” (Part 1) (http://www.concertina.com/chambers/lachenal-part1/index.htm)
Some Notes on Lachenal Concertina Production and Serial Numbers (http://www.concertina.com/chambers/lachenal-production/)
I've never handled or taken apart an English concertina before, it was very interesting to compare the build quality, with all the pristine chamois gaskets to, say, a modern Chinese Hohner. And Lachenal were turning them out in their thousands.
The Chinese Hohner would be the equivalent of one of the very cheap German concertinas that were still on the market when I started out, and even the very cheapest English-made concertina was of vastly superior quality to them. But then, it was also a lot more expensive...
-
Here's a link to a restored Lachenal label I created some years ago now. There used to be a permanent link on the Concertina.net website but most of that (with the exception of the Forum) is closed down now.
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk137/p_m_dunk/Labels/lach_label_plus_border.jpg (http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk137/p_m_dunk/Labels/lach_label_plus_border.jpg)
Save
Pete, all I get is the photobucket 3rd party hosting error message. I believe you now have to pay mega £s to display a photobucket image on a 3rd party site such as melnet. :(
-
Works ok for me.
-
Works ok for me.
That's curious, it doesn't for me...
-
All I seem to get is rubbish, sexey I'll grant you but rubbish all the same.
-
All the photomuckit images should still be intact and accessible directly at the photomuckit website Steve, but not from embedded urls or it seems third party site links, must be being blocked as looking from outside rather than starting in photomuckit. Part of the link must be the account or user reference and part the image reference.
How to win customers and endear yourselves to the World eh ?
Hope MelFetts don't take this as a business model :o
I enjoyed the Pathe video of 1961 Concertina Manufacture from Triskels Lachenal history page
-
Here's a link to a restored Lachenal label I created some years ago now.
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk137/p_m_dunk/Labels/lach_label_plus_border.jpg (http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk137/p_m_dunk/Labels/lach_label_plus_border.jpg)
They (photomuckit) seem to think that accessing a photo on their website from their website is third party hosting. tried searching for it, that doesn't work either.
Edit: Ha! - got it, try this for all the labels Pete Dunk's Labels (http://s279.photobucket.com/user/p_m_dunk/library/Labels)
-
It's no longer working for me now.
-
If I'm signed into Photobucket I can access Peter Dunk's "Lachenal Label" Album (http://s279.photobucket.com/user/p_m_dunk/library/Lachenal%20Label?sort=3&page=1), but it still won't let me open any of the images... :(
Photobucket have broken the internet! >:(
-
Edit: Ha! - got it, try this for all the labels Pete Dunk's Labels (http://s279.photobucket.com/user/p_m_dunk/library/Labels)
I think I've found a workaround if you want one of Pete's labels.
This is what you do...
1. Click on my link above
2. Click on slideshow - top right under all the coloured social media icons
3. Wait until the one you want comes up - hand on the mouse with the pointer over the images
4. Click right button and quickly select 'Save Image As...'
5. Click the Save button
6. Look in your downloads folder or use the browser's toolbar downloads button if it has one
That's in Firefox - other browsers will be similar
-
Here you go:
Labels galore. (https://app.box.com/s/ovyv3u6h0lmnxbsr01ofgfxrkuqyojwu)
-
Here you go:
Labels galore. (https://app.box.com/s/ovyv3u6h0lmnxbsr01ofgfxrkuqyojwu)
Ey-up! (:) :|glug
-
Fantastic, and great to see.